Horology and Coaching Lawyering: ‘Coaching for Change’

Legal profession and academics are struggling to define new concept of horology for lawyers. They are not only questioning the importance of time management issues, but the different literature of it has captured their attention theoretically and practically. Horology is studied in a vast concept that contains a software learning for lawyers in which precise time they are to reflect by professionally defensive tools. Objections, interferences, verbal challenging defenses, for example, are applied to manage a trial session as planned. Of course, lawyers possibly are using their emotional intelligence to perform a defense that is not foreseen in their prefabricated strategy.

The author was a lawyer for more than twenty years before establishing his coaching practice, ‘Coaching for Change’. As a notion announced, a lawyer’s mission is to assist lawyers with managing and growing their practices so they enjoy their tasks more and make more money. Lawyering style has been experienced and structured by the privilege of working with hundreds of excellent lawyers throughout the past four decades. What is observed is that lawyers genuinely care about those they serve. This is proven by the fact that too many were stressed and overwhelmed because they wanted to do everything possible to serve their clients. They are looking for serious chances to use all they know to change their feeling. While their clients describe their lawyers with all skills introducing their lawyers as exceptional ones, it also will make them easy prey for the following time management issues that will leave even the most seasoned attorneys stressed out.

Being a perfectionist is a necessary criterion for assessing the style of lawyering. It is not a claim that not everything requires 100% of lawyers’ attentions. Consideration for the Pareto Principle. This principle is explaining a situation that it gets 80% of their outcome from 20% of their efforts.  Learning what needs to be perfect and what does not is highly recommended in order to improve their lawyering style. It also takes evaluation and prioritization into account. A brief for a corporate client, for instance, will require 100% of a lawyer’s effort. A simple court order, however, may not require to change the language to perfection. The importance of debate refers to the necessity of monitoring trail status to trigger at the best time. In the path of fruit development, metaphorically, there is a flower in the beginning. At the right time, the flower turns into a fruit, but this fruit cannot be picked because it is a bush. At a certain time, it is time to pick it and if it is not, it will spoil. Therefore, lawyers in a trial court must know when exactly to use their tools. In fact, when the fruit is ripe, if they do not use their tool in defense or objection at the right time, it will not result in its effective result.

The world of law is just the word. Concept and conceptual structures are functioning as vital players. Undoubtedly, the vast majority of the law knowledge taught to law students is about legal contents. They are applied to attack or defend by lawyers in trials. However, it is not necessarily enough to achieve justice. The game of strategies and approaches determines the destination of a case. The judge and juries are sitting to extract facts from all words dancing in a session. To obtain a highly profound target, strategic lawyering prepares techniques and mechanisms in order to hunt lawyers’ chance changing their fateful game. Therefore, it is expected from bar associations and law faculties to regulate professional conduct of attorneys licensed by the bars through discipline. Consequently, to better strategic managing, time is as important as mining facts.

To sum up, horology is a new-found approach to coach lawyers in order to change the law game defined as branch of lawyering style. Its concept is much more profound than time management. Developed law societies have passed across traditional contents like time management. Without any doubt, it is more useful. Although no one is to overlook the necessity of time management, the concept of strategic lawyering has never been restricted to management the time at all.  A professional lawyer is to monitor events and facts as well as different types of evidence. As mentioned above, an eyewitness is presenting details, while his details are possibly not sheer truth or even enough to present the precise events. It is lawyers’ function to be anchored in the fact at the precise time.