The importance of Personal Diplomacy in Lawyering
There is a subtle difference between personal diplomacy implied by the lawyers when they are working on legal cases, although their cases’ nature are not seemingly similar. In Iran like other countries, any kinds of corruption have been forbidden. Even it is criminalized by criminal code and the punishment like a long jail is predicted. Therefore, lawyers and judges are highly recommended to respect and ensure to respect not to cross the related red borders like any crime commitments included bribe, blackmail, conspiracy, jobbery and so on. Therefore, they must manage any kinds of personal and professional behavior wherever they are standing on a legal position and stance. Meanwhile, it seems that personal diplomacy has been defined as a kind of corruption. It is not advised to use it as a tool for defending in the courts, at all. Conversely, some post-modern notions reject the incorrect view mentioned above. Personal diplomacy has been applied as a defending tool when it is applied in the precise point. The followers do make serious difference between personal diplomacy and jobbery as an improper or corrupt act or conduct.
Since 1968, the world of lawyers has changed dramatically in all legal dimensions. The literature used vastly by barristers and judges is undoubtedly reshaped. Hence, some innovative concepts are suggested profoundly to restructure new contexts making lawyers face a different world of law. Therefore, lawyering is one of the most important concepts generated by a modern conceptual revolution in law context.
In the new concept of lawyering, solicitors as well as paralegals are working in the courts in order to assist judges and the juries with figuring out the case details without any bios. Nevertheless, justice and just judgment are an indispensable part of judicial behavior, viewing with any bios as well as applying a cruel judgment will push sovereignties onto collapsing track. Consequently, the closure will be anarchism and convulsive disorders sacrificing law and order. To expect practically, personal diplomacy should possibly assist any judicial systems with clarifying subjects and laws by the legal and correct line of law and logic. Moreover, a robust personality or special characteristic of lawyers leads the listeners to a specific point where it is supposed or expected to be led to. In this regard, it is precisely eligible to be applied. Personal diplomacy, consequently, is defined as a normal behavior affecting other players in a judicial trial impressively.
Lawyers’ backgrounds, their scientific activities, sensitive functions done or applied, famous branding in national or international atmosphere or even previous backgrounds of friendships or any kinds of relationship, for examples, play a vital role to make or prepare a serious chance to attract the judges or the juries in order to observe the case from dimension designed and structured by lawyers when they are defending professionally. Furthermore, an attractive personality is challenging all players in chamber courts while they are working on an accused involving a murder or blackmail, for instance. Absolutely, an impressive, strong and succinct language are mostly useful when they are received by an impressive lawyer.
Horology is another necessity to assist lawyers with deciding precisely and in its own correct time. This skill will serve lawyers when they receive correct and exact kinds of data on their cases. They will be prepared by a real situation attracting points for more realistic prediction or expectation about what is happening or happened related to the judge or juries’ decisions. It is not likely to be obtained if lawyers cannot be taught skillfully about personal diplomacy.
In conclusion, it is crystal clear that personal diplomacy recently is defined as a new concept containing all personal capacities. Therefore, it brings the lawyers closer to their pre-designed goals. Lawyers are authorized to use all personal abilities and capacities to exchange their ideas and views with the judges, perosecutors, detectors, experts and even other parties involved in a judicial case. This method is opposite of all kinds of corruptions. Its literature is seriously different with jobbery and so on.