آموزش، توانایی های دانشجویان و نقش دولت

Some people argue that government should decide about the subjects and courses that students should follow based on their capabilities. Others believe that parents and children should decide on their own based on their wishes without the interference of the government. Discuss Beth ideas and give you opinion?

Perhaps, one of the most important educational issues argued controversially is to what extent governmental inter fences are legally authorized to apply unilateral policies in order to plan and organize the teenager’s courses. There is a myriad of reasons to defend or refuse such relevant approaches. It seems both attitudes can play their own correct functions conditionally. But different cultural situations of effective pedagogy and its leaking methods should be taken into account if the effective result is expected meanwhile, it is not easy to clarify this question with a narrow mind about haw it is possible to achieve improving educational performance, increasing leering satisfaction, promoting innovation and encouraging children in order ti boost up their own creativities. And it is also hard to elaborate about how it does not lead to perpetuating social and individual an unfairness and injustice.

A vast range of authors and lethal academics articulate the vital necessity of the consideration of individual’s capabilities in making educational policies. There is a myriad of reasons to justify such an important attitude. First and foremost, the greatest and the only goal of states is to establish primary intervening targets for education regarding the interest of individuals and the societies as a whole. It is expected to administrative organizational infrastructures based on just and fair mentalities. Because people have been categorized by various criteria extracted from their skills, political, business and individual acumen and their own abilities structured by their family backgrounds, cultural atmospheres of well, if they were recognized personally by their capabilities. Consequently, they are happy in their works and lives as well as their states serving them to live better and more perfectly. They are, therefore, fully satisfied about the achievement of their predesigned educational goals. For example, the organization of a society has been structured as well as based on the people working as lawyers, teachers, brokers or other professions in the society. This is a clear recognition of a state to plan targeted approaches in arranging and reshaping its community in order to make actual obstacles in from of social disarray and facilitating all needed to live comfortably like a precise educational program.

Last but not least, the principal responsibility of all states is to prepare all facilities to base the roots of sustainable development. Hence, the states design in an obligatory manner to push their citizens by short and long-term policies to move on a correct path. The research done by King’s College London published in Aug 2018 in UK, points out that some countries in the west of Africa like Somalia fail to achieve the UN programs on development their previously approved plans have be decelerated in favor of and the ignorance of performing such a necessity. It is the main reason of raising the public apathy in some countries in Middle East like Iran and Pakistan. This idea has been accorded perfectly by the center of strategic researches in Australia by some annals collected in the recent decade. This idea’s proponents believe the lack of such a mentality is likely to social aridity. Therefore, it meets the needs of aristocracy and expands the current gaps in social atmosphere. As a result, this phenomenon has its own dire consequences. Meanwhile, they do not recommend applying fewer interfaces. While everything is not black and white, such an approach put the society at a serious and irrevocable risk damaging not only the people living nowadays, influencing the future generations as well. To sum up, the governments obliged are to distribute the current facilities and reshape the structure of the societies in an appropriate teaching and learning systems in terms of their own citizen’s capabilities.

On the other hand, many lecturers in the colleges and universities attempt to attract individuals and public attentions on the role of student’s families and their own parents in leading educational policies. They believe the robust role of parents regarding the process of end action is an indispensable part of pedagogy. The experiences of the history of human prescribe us to prioritize a formidable function of the parents and put it on the top of the list. Had the state taken into account regarding such a necessity more, less grave problems like increasing organized crimes, rape and other similar intense crimes would have been observed less. Instead of states, parents can comply teenagers to obey social dictated norms, customs and some unwritten rules. The result of researches done by the thigh court of Australia (2017-Sydney) points out that the teenagers lining in Sydney respect for freely and then perform more precisely whatever motivated by their parents in comparison with officially approved policies instructs by the Australian government. Hence, the state of NSW recommends the federal state to persuade parents to play a much more effective role, because this approach influences amiably the decreasing rate of a risk of national, regional and trans boundry harms.

Having cited above points strongly believe in the idea that people including adults and teenagers must educated constitutionally by the public and predesigned policies approved by the governments extracted from people’s needs and necessities. However, the vital and fundamental function of parents cannot be ignored at all. Even if we live in a developed country organized well, we do not have any logical evidence allowances to overlook the role of mothers and fathers. Consequently, it is a must that both of them should work in collaboration. The teenager’s personalities are extremely complicated. Not only the stated cannot discover their personality’s laden dimensions, their interference may lead then to an unpredictable status as well. Nonetheless, the necessity of teenage is not to obey the norms and rules passed by parliaments or cabinets as statutes. Hence, they attempt unconsciously to choose a different way about their temporary lives. Therefore, parents can play their role as a robust shield metaphorically in order to preserve them from all anti-social misconducts or the commented of crimes and torts.